| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
J Health Info Stat > Volume 48(4); 2023 > Article
한국인 고령자의 생활환경과 중고강도 여가 신체활동 참여와의 관련성

요약

목적

본 연구는 한국의 고령자들을 대상으로 주거 지역·마을·유형의 생활환경과 중고강도 여가 신체활동 참여의 관련성을 조사하였다.

방법

국민건강영양조사(2014-2019)에 참여한 60세 이상의 성인 남녀 7,594명을 분석대상으로 하였다. 생활환경을 평가하기 위해 대상자의 주거 지역·마을 · 유형을 각각 (1) 7대 특 ·광역시와 (2) 기타 지역, (1) 동과 (2) 읍 ·면, (1) 아파트와 (2) 주택으로 분류하였다. 중고강도 여가 신체활동은 Global Physical Activity Questionnaire을 사용하여 측정되었으며, 삼분위수로 분류하여 활동 정도를 평가하였다.

결과

기타 지역, 읍 ·면, 주택 거주자의 중고강도 여가 신체활동 최하위 삼분위수의 비율은 7대 특 ·광역시, 동, 아파트 거주자보다 높게 나타났지만, 중간 및 최상위 삼분위수의 경우 반대의 결과가 나타났다(p <0.001 for all). 본 연구에 참여하는 남녀 모두, 7대 특 ·광역시, 동, 아파트에 거주하는 자는 기타지역, 읍 ·면, 주택에 거주하는 자에 비교하여 중고강도 여가 신체활동의 중위 삼분위수에 해당할 교차비(95% 신뢰구간)가 각각 1.56 (1.27-1.91), 1.94 (1.53-2.46), 1.42 (1.15-1.75), 1.66 (1.46-1.90), 1.78 (1.53-2.08) 그리고 1.24 (1.08-1.43)이었다(p <0.01 for all). 중고강도 여가신체활동의 최고위 삼분위수에 해당할 교차비(95% 신뢰구간)는 각각 1.80 (1.47-2.20), 2.57 (1.99-3.31), 1.52 (1.23-1.87), 1.85 (1.60-2.14), 2.23 (1.85-2.67) 그리고 1.21 (1.03-1.41)이었다(p <0.05 for all).

결론

대도시의 아파트에 거주하는 한국인 고령자의 경우 성별에 관계없이 중고강도 여가 신체활동량이 높은 것으로 사료된다.

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the relationship between living environments, such as regions, towns and dwelling types, and recreational moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (RMVPA) engagement in the older Korean population.

Methods

A total of 7,594 male and female subjects aged ≥60 years were included. To evaluate living environments, participants’ regions, towns and dwelling types were each sorted into two conditions: (1) special regions (i.e., South Korea's capital city and six metropolitan regions, the largest cities in each province) and (2) other regions; (1) dongs (urbanized areas) and (2) eups and myeons (rural areas); and (1) apartments and (2) houses. RMVPA was assessed using the short form of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and separated into tertiles.

Results

The percentages of the lowest tertiles of RMVPA in other regions, eups and myeons, and houses were higher than those in one special and six metropolitan regions, dongs and apartments. However, the percentages of middle and highest tertiles showed the opposite results (p <0.001 for all). Subjects living in special regions, dongs and apartments were 1.56, 1.94, 1.42, 1.66, 1.78, and 1.24 times more likely to be in the middle RMVPA tertile in male and female subjects, respectively, relative to those in other regions, eups and myeons, and houses (p <0.01 for all). Those living in special regions, dongs and apartments were 1.80, 2.57, 1.52, 1.85, 2.23, and 1.21 times more likely to be in the highest RMVPA tertile in male and female subjects, respectively, relative to those in other regions, eups and myeons, and houses (p <0.05 for all).

Conclusions

Living in an apartment in a large, urbanized city may be positively related to higher RMVPA engagement in the older Korean population, regardless of sex.

INTRODUCTION

In 2025, South Korea is expected to become a superaged society, which is defined as having ≥20.0% of the population aged 65 years or older, and the older population is expected to show a dramatic increase in the forth-coming decades [1]. Since aging is related to physical frailty and functional limitations, the economic and health care burden related to the older population will noticeably increase in Korean society [2-5]. Based on this consideration, maintaining good physical functioning in the older population and thereby extending independent community-based life is necessary. It is broadly accepted that engaging in physical activity (PA) induces various health benefits in the older population [3,6,7]. Despite the well-known positive influence, globally, 60-70% of the older population does not meet PA guidelines, which emphasizes the need to promote PA in the older population [8]. As a countermeasure to compensate for the lack of PA, the promotion of recreational PA is recommended due to the low likelihood of the older population being active at home and work [9,10]. Recreational PA is characterized by intentional engagement in exercise and is regarded as the most important physical activity domain in public health [11]. Considering all of these factors, promoting recreational PA may contribute to extending independent community-based life by leading to the fulfillment of PA guidelines.
Recently, many researchers have employed social-ecological models to explain PA engagement, indicating the importance of the living environment in which the physical form of communities, large- and small-scale built and natural features, and the transportation system affect PA engagement [12-15]. In particular, Kahn et al. [6] highlighted that the availability and accessibility of places to engage in PA may be associated with higher levels of recreational PA. However, such studies, especially those investigating the relationship between living environment and recreational PA, are limited in South Korea. Most of the studies focused only on the total quantity of moderate-to-vigorous PA and did not focus on a specific PA domain, such as recreational PA. Thus, the present study explored the relationship between living environment and recreational-PA engagement in the older Korean population.

METHODS

Study design and subjects

For this cross-sectional study, a database composed of general health, nutritional status, and lifestyle data of the Korean population gathered during the Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (KNHANES) of 2014-2019 was utilized. The analysis of this study involved 7,594 subjects (2,413 men and 5,181 women) from the KNHANES that were aged ≥60 years, which have been used to represent an older population in many previous studies [16-19]. Each subject provided written informed consent. This study was performed under the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Silla University (IRB No.: 1041449-202203-HR-001).

Living environments and RMVPA

In this study, to evaluate subjects’ living environments, their regions, towns and dwelling types were assessed. Regions were sorted into two conditions: (1) special regions (one special region and six metropolitan regions) and (2) other regions. Special regions comprised Seoul, South Korea's capital city, and Busan, Incheon, Daegu, Daejeon and Gwangju, the largest cities in each province. Towns were sorted into two conditions: (1) dongs and (2) eups and myeons. A dong is an urbanized area within a city, and eups and myeons are rural areas within a city. Dwelling types were divided into two conditions: (1) apartments and (2) houses.
To evaluate recreational PA, recreational moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (RMVPA) was adopted because that PA category primarily contributes to health promotion [20]. RMVPA was assessed by using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), which has been employed and recommended by the World Health Organization [21]. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire have been verified in several nations [22-25]. In this study, RMVPA was sorted into tertiles to evaluate the quantity of PA among the subjects.

Other parameters and covariates

Height was assessed to the nearest 0.1 cm in a standing position without shoes, and body mass was assessed to the nearest 0.1 kg using a digital electronic scale while wearing light clothing. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2).
Parameters that have been considered or reported to affect the association between living conditions and RMVPA were selected as covariates: age, marital status, household income, educational level, medication use, alcohol consumption, smoking status, muscle strength, and nutrition. Marriage status was self-reported. Household income was assorted by using tertiles. Self-reported alcohol consumption was categorized as never, ≤1 time/week, 2-3 times/week, or ≥4 times/week; educational level was categorized as primary, middle and high school, or college or beyond; and smoking status was categorized as never, former, or current smoker [26,27]. Medication use was recorded based on a self-reported prescription from a physician. Muscle strength was evaluated by utilizing handgrip strength, which was assessed three times each for the right and left hands, and then the average value was adopted [28]. Nutritional data, including total energy, carbohydrate, protein and fat intake, were gathered by using a food frequency questionnaire composed of 63 food items that are considered critical energy sources and nutrients. The questionnaire was designed as an open-ended survey for reporting a variety of dishes and foods using the 24-h recall method with various measuring aids [29].

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean±standard deviation (SD), percentage and number, or odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Kol-mogorov‒ Smirnov test was employed to identify the normality of continuous variables (Table 1). The independent t test or the Mann‒ Whitney U test was adopted to compare variables between males and females (Table 2). The overall and sex-specific distributions of living conditions by RMVPA tertiles were explored using chi-square (Table 3). Logistic regression was adopted to identify the sex-specific odds ratio for the associations of the regions, towns and dwelling types with the middle and highest tertile of RMVPA (Tables 4 and 5). Model 1 was unadjusted; Model 2 was adjusted for Model 1 plus age; Model 3 was adjusted for Model 2 plus marriage status, household income and educational level; Model 4 was adjusted for Model 3 plus medication use; Model 5 was adjusted for Model 4 plus drinking and smoking status; and Model 6 was adjusted for Model 5 plus muscle strength and nutrition. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS software, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). p <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Table 1
The normality tests of continuous variables
Variables Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
Statistic Degree of freedom p
RMVPA (min/wk) 0.395 7594 <0.001
Age (y) 0.091 7594 <0.001
Height (cm) 0.046 7594 <0.001
Body weight (kg) 0.051 7594 <0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2) 0.041 7594 <0.001
Handgrip strength (kg) 0.100 7594 <0.001
Total energy intake (kcal/d) 0.104 7594 <0.001
Carbohydrate intake (g/d) 0.066 7594 <0.001
Protein intake (g/d) 0.095 7594 <0.001
Fat intake (g/d) 0.110 7594 <0.001

RMVPA, recreational moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

Table 2
Characteristics of study subjects
Variables Total (n=7,594) Male (n=2,413) Female (n=5,181) p
RMVPA (min/wk)1 73.1±195.0 104.4±257.6 58.6±155.4 <0.001
Dwelling region 0.472
  One special and six metropolitan regions 3,325 (43.8) 1,071 (44.4) 2,254 (43.5)
  Other regions 4,269 (56.2) 1,342 (55.6) 2,927 (56.5)
Dwelling town 0.395
  Dongs 5,652 (74.4) 1,811 (75.1) 3,841 (74.1)
  Eups and myeons 1,942 (25.6) 602 (24.9) 1,340 (25.9)
Dwelling type 0.535
  Apartment 4,624 (60.9) 1,457 (60.4) 3,167 (61.1)
  House 2,970 (39.1) 9,560 (39.6) 2,014 (38.9)
Age (y)1 70.0±6.5 69.9±6.4 70.0±6.5 0.447
Height (cm)1 161.4±8.3 160.3±8.1 161.9±8.4 <0.001
Body weight (kg)1 62.8±10.9 61.8±10.6 63.3±11.0 <0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.1±3.3 24.0±3.3 24.1±3.3 0.201
Handgrip strength (kg)1 27.4±8.9 26.2±8.4 28.0±9.0 <0.001
Total energy intake (kcal/d)1 1,807.6±751.6 1,499.1±399.8 1,951.2±829.9 <0.001
Carbohydrate intake (g/d)1 285.8±114.2 247.9±75.7 303.4±124.4 <0.001
Protein intake (g/d)1 63.4±32.1 52.8±20.3 68.3±35.3 <0.001
Fat intake (g/d)1 36.8±27.1 29.0±16.5 40.5±30.2 <0.001
Marriage status <0.05
  Married 7,519 (99.0) 2,381 (98.7) 5,138 (99.2)
  Unmarried 75 (1.0) 32 (1.8) 43 (0.8)
Medication
  Hypertension 3,720 (49.0) 1,124 (46.6) 2,596 (50.1) <0.01
  Diabetes 1,427 (18.8) 474 (19.6) 953 (18.4) 0.194
  Hyperlipidemia 1,994 (26.3) 433 (17.9) 1,561 (30.1) <0.001
Household income <0.001
  Low 3,092 (40.9) 817 (34.0) 2,275 (44.1)
  Lower-middle 2,091 (27.7) 698 (29.0) 1,393 (27.0)
  Upper middle 1,365 (17.9) 487 (20.2) 869 (16.9)
  High 1,019 (13.5) 403 (16.8) 616 (12.0)
Education level <0.001
  Primary school 4,194 (55.5) 851 (35.5) 3,343 (64.9)
  Middle school 1,209 (16.0) 443 (18.5) 766 (14.9)
  High school 1,364 (18.1) 642 (26.8) 722 (14.0)
  College 783 (10.4) 463 (19.3) 320 (6.2)
Alcohol consumption <0.001
  Never 3,732 (49.1) 698 (28.9) 3,034 (58.6)
  ≤Once a week 2,750 (36.2) 875 (36.3) 1,875 (36.2)
  2-3 Times/week 637 (8.4) 447 (18.5) 190 (3.7)
  ≥4 Times/week 475 (6.3) 393 (16.3) 82 (1.6)
Smoking <0.001
  Never 5,365 (70.6) 496 (20.6) 4,869 (94.0)
  Former smoking 1,574 (20.7) 1,400 (58.0) 174 (3.4)
  Current smoking 655 (8.6) 517 (21.4) 138 (2.7)

Values are means±SDs or number of subjects (percentage).

RMVPA, recreational moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

1 Mann‒ Whitney U test was used to compare males and females.

Table 3
Sex-specific differences of dwelling conditions from the lowest to highest recreational moderate-to-vigorous recreational physical activity tertiles
Variables Lowest tertile (n=3,478) Range value=0.0 Middle tertile (n=2,313) Range value=1.0 - 30.0 Highest tertile (n=1,803) Range value≥31.0 p for difference
Males
  Dwelling regions <0.001
    One special and six metropolitan regions 37.7 (404) 29.5 (316) 32.8 (351)
    Other regions 51.2 (687) 25.3 (339) 23.5 (316)
  Dwelling towns <0.001
    Dongs (n=1,811) 40.2 (728) 28.8 (521) 31.0 (562)
    Eups and myeons (n=602) 60.3 (363) 22.3 (134) 17.4 (105)
  Dwelling types <0.001
    Apartments 38.7 (370) 29.3 (280) 32.0 (306)
    Houses 49.5 (721) 25.7 (375) 24.8 (361)
Females
  Dwelling regions <0.001
    One special and six metropolitan regions 37.5 (845) 36.2 (816) 26.3 (593)
    Other regions 52.7 (1,542) 28.8 (842) 18.6 (543)
  Dwelling towns <0.001
    Dongs (n=3,841) 41.0 (1,574) 34.4 (1,323) 24.6 (944)
    Eups and myeons (n=1,340) 60.7 (813) 20.5 (335) 14.3 (192)
  Dwelling types <0.001
    Apartments 41.1 (828) 35.0 (704) 23.9 (482)
    Houses 49.2 (1,559) 30.1 (954) 20.7 (654)

Values are percentage (number).

Table 4
Sex specific odds ratio for the association between the dwelling regions, towns or types and the middle tertile of recreational moderate-to-vigor ous physical activity
Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
Male (n=2,413)
  Dwelling regions
    One special and six metropolitan regions (n=1,071) 1.59 (1.30-1.93)*** 1.59 (1.30-1.93)*** 1.57 (1.29-1.92)*** 1.58 (1.29-1.93)*** 1.57 (1.29-1.92)*** 1.56 (1.27-1.91)***
    Other regions (n=1,342) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
  Dwelling towns
    Dongs (n=1,811) 1.94 (1.54-2.43)*** 1.94 (1.55-2.44)*** 1.89 (1.50-2.39)*** 1.90 (1.51-2.40)*** 1.93 (1.52-2.44)*** 1.94 (1.53-2.46)***
    Eups and myeons (n=602) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
  Dwelling types
    Apartments (n=956) 1.45 (1.19-1.78)*** 1.46 (1.19-1.78)*** 1.40 (1.14-1.73)** 1.40 (1.14-1.73)** 1.41 (1.14-1.74)** 1.42 (1.15-1.75)**
    Houses (n=1,457) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Female (n=5,181)
  Dwelling regions
    One special and six metropolitan regions (n=2,254) 1.77 (1.56-2.01)*** 1.70 (1.49-1.93)*** 1.64 (1.44-2.87)*** 1.63 (1.43-1.86)*** 1.64 (1.44-1.87)*** 1.66 (1.46-1.90)***
    Other regions (n=2,927) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
  Dwelling towns
    Dongs (n=3,841) 2.04 (1.76-2.36)*** 1.90 (1.64-2.20)*** 1.80 (1.55-2.10)*** 1.80 (1.55-2.10)*** 1.80 (1.55-2.10)*** 1.78 (1.53-2.08)***
    Eups and myeons (n=1,340) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
  Dwelling types
    Apartments (n=2,014) 1.39 (1.22-1.58)*** 1.32 (1.16-1.50)*** 1.21 (1.06-1.39)** 1.21 (1.06-1.39)** 1.22 (1.07-1.40)** 1.24 (1.08-1.43)**
    Houses (n=3,167) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference

Values are odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

Model 1: Unadjusted.

Model 2: Adjusted for Model 1 plus age.

Model 3: Adjusted for Model 2 plus marriage status, household income and education level.

Model 4: Adjusted for Model 3 plus medication use.

Model 5: Adjusted for Model 4 plus drinking and smoking habits.

Model 6: Adjusted for Model 5 plus strength and nutrition.

* p <0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001.

Table 5
Sex specific odds ratio for the association between the dwelling regions, towns or types and the highest tertile of recreational moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6
Male (n=2,413)
  Dwelling regions
    One special and six metropolitan regions (n=1,071) 1.89 (1.55-2.30)*** 1.87 (1.54-2.27)*** 1.81 (1.48-2.21)*** 1.83 (1.50-2.23)*** 1.83 (1.49-2.23)*** 1.80 (1.47-2.20)***
    Other regions (n=1,342) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
  Dwelling towns
    Dongs (n=1,811) 2.67 (2.09-3.40)*** 2.63 (2.06-3.36)*** 2.48 (1.94-3.18)*** 2.51 (1.96-3.22)*** 2.57 (2.00-3.30)*** 2.57 (1.99-3.31)***
    Eups and myeons (n=602) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
  Dwelling types
    Apartments (n=956) 1.65 (1.36-2.01)*** 1.62 (1.33-1.97)*** 1.50 (1.22-1.84)*** 1.51 (1.22-1.85)*** 1.51 (1.22-1.86)*** 1.52 (1.23-1.87)***
    Houses (n=1,457) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Female (n=5,181)
  Dwelling regions
    One special and six metropolitan regions (n=2,254) 1.99 (1.73-2.30)*** 1.92 (1.66-2.21)*** 1.86 (1.60-2.15)*** 1.83 (1.58-2.12)*** 1.84 (1.58-2.13)*** 1.85 (1.60-2.14)***
    Other regions (n=2,927) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
  Dwelling towns
    Dongs (n=3,841) 2.54 (2.13-3.03)*** 2.37 (1.99-2.84)*** 2.27 (1.89-2.72)*** 2.24 (1.86-2.86)*** 2.24 (1.87-2.69)*** 2.23 (1.85-2.67)***
    Eups and myeons (n=1,340) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
  Dwelling types
    Apartments (n=2,014) 1.40 (1.20-1.60)*** 1.32 (1.14-1.53)*** 1.21 (1.04-1.41)* 1.19 (1.02-1.39)* 1.20 (1.03-1.40)* 1.21 (1.03-1.41)*
    Houses (n=3,167) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference

Values are odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

Model 1: Unadjusted.

Model 2: Adjusted for Model 1 plus age.

Model 3: Adjusted for Model 2 plus marriage status, household income and education level.

Model 4: Adjusted for Model 3 plus medication use.

Model 5: Adjusted for Model 4 plus drinking and smoking habits.

Model 6: Adjusted for Model 5 plus strength and nutrition.

* p <0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001.

RESULTS

Table 1 displays the normality test results of continuous variables. All the variables, including RMVPA, age, height, body weight, body mass index, handgrip strength, and total energy, carbohydrate, protein and fat intake, had nonnormal distributions.
Table 2 exhibits the characteristics of the study subjects. The average RMVPA was 73.1 min/week, and the quantity of RMVPA in male subjects was greater than that in females (p <0.001). There were no significant differences in living conditions between males and females, including for region, town and dwelling type, age and BMI. Height and body weight in female subjects were greater than those in male subjects (p < 0.001 for both).
Table 3 shows the sex-specific differences of living conditions from the lowest to highest RMVPA tertiles. For the differences among RMVPA categories, in both male and female subjects, all living conditions, such as regions, towns and dwelling types, indicated significant differences (p <0.001 for all). The percentages of lowest tertiles of RMVPA in other regions, eups and myeons, and houses were higher than those in one special and six metropolitan regions, dongs and apartments. However, the percentages of middle and highest tertiles in one special and six metropolitan regions, dongs and apartments are higher than those in other regions, eups and myeons, and houses.
The sex-specific odds ratios for the associations of regions, towns and dwelling types with the middle tertile of RMVPA are shown in Table 4. Regarding male subjects’ dwelling regions, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to other regions, special regions had odds ratios of 1.59 (1.30-2.93), 1.59 (1.30-1.93), 1.57 (1.29-1.92), 1.58 (1.29-1.93), 1.57 (1.29-1.92), and 1.56 (1.27-1.91) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Regarding male subjects’ dwelling towns, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to eups and myeons, dongs had odds ratios of 1.94 (1.54-2.43), 1.94 (1.55-2.44), 1.89 (1.50-2.39), 1.90 (1.51-2.40), 1.93 (1.52-2.44), and 1.94 (1.53-2.46) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Regarding male subjects’ dwelling types, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to houses, apartments had odds ratios of 1.45 (1.19-1.78), 1.46 (1.19-1.78), 1.40 (1.14-1.73), 1.40 (1.14-1.73), 1.41 (1.14-1.74), and 1.42 (1.15-1.75) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Concerning female subjects’ dwelling regions, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to other regions, special regions had odds ratios of 1.77 (1.56-2.01), 1.70 (1.49-1.93), 1.64 (1.44-2.87), 1.63 (1.43-1.86), 1.64 (1.44-1.87), and 1.66 (1.46-1.90) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Concerning female subjects’ dwelling towns, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to eups and myeons, dongs had odds ratios of 2.04 (1.76-2.36), 1.90 (1.64-2.20), 1.80 (1.55-2.10), 1.80 (1.55-2.10), 1.80 (1.55-2.10), and 1.78 (1.53-2.08) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Concerning female subjects’ dwelling types, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to houses, apartments had odds ratios of 1.39 (1.22-1.58), 1.32 (1.16-1.50), 1.21 (1.06-1.39), 1.21 (1.06-1.39), 1.22 (1.07-1.40), and 1.24 (1.08-1.43) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.01 for all).
The sex-specific odds ratios for the associations of regions, towns and dwelling types with the highest tertile of RMVPA are shown in Table 5. Regarding male subjects’ dwelling regions, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to other regions, special regions had odds ratios of 1.89 (1.55-2.30), 1.87 (1.54-2.27), 1.81 (1.48-2.21), 1.83 (1.50-2.23), 1.83 (1.49-2.23), and 1.80 (1.47-2.20) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Regarding male subjects’ dwelling towns, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to eups and myeons, dongs had odds ratios of 2.67 (2.09-3.40), 2.63 (2.06-3.36), 2.48 (1.94-3.18), 2.51 (1.96-3.22), 2.57 (2.00-3.30), and 2.57 (1.99-3.31) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Regarding male subjects’ dwelling types, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to houses, apartments had odds ratios of 1.65 (1.36-2.01), 1.62 (1.33-1.97), 1.50 (1.22-1.84), 1.51 (1.22-1.85), 1.51 (1.22-1.86), and 1.52 (1.23-1.87) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Concerning female subjects’ dwelling regions, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to other regions, special regions had odds ratios of 1.99 (1.73-2.30), 1.92 (1.66-2.21), 1.86 (1.60-2.15), 1.83 (1.58-2.12), 1.84 (1.58-2.13), and 1.85 (1.60-2.14) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Concerning female subjects’ dwelling towns, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to eups and myeons, dongs had odds ratios of 2.54 (2.13-3.03), 2.37 (1.99-2.84), 2.27 (1.89-2.72), 2.24 (1.86-2.86), 2.24 (1.87-2.69), and 2.23 (1.85-2.67) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.001 for all). Concerning female subjects’ dwelling types, in Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, relative to houses, apartments had odds ratios of 1.40 (1.20-1.60), 1.32 (1.14-1.53), 1.21 (1.04-1.41), 1.19 (1.02-1.39), 1.20 (1.03-1.40), and 1.21 (1.03-1.41) for the highest tertile of RMVPA, respectively (p <0.05 for all).

DISCUSSION

The purpose of the present study was to explore the relationship between living environments, such as regions, towns and dwelling types, and RMVPA engagement in a sample taken from an older Korean population. The percentages of lowest tertiles of RMVPA in other regions, eups and myeons, and houses were higher than those in one special and six metropolitan regions, dongs and apartments. However, the percentages of middle and highest tertiles showed the opposite results (p <0.001 for all). Subjects living in special regions, dongs and apartments were 1.56, 1.94, 1.42, 1.66, 1.78, and 1.24 times more likely to be in the middle RM-VPA tertile in male and female subjects, respectively, relative to those in other regions, eups and myeons, and houses (p <0.01 for all). Those living in special regions, dongs and apartments were 1.80, 2.57, 1.52, 1.85, 2.23, and 1.21 times more likely to be in the highest RMVPA tertile in male and female subjects, respectively, relative to those in other regions, eups and myeons, and houses (p <0.05 for all). These findings suggest that living in an apartment in an urbanized large city may positively contribute to RMVPA engagement in the older Korean population, regardless of sex.
The present study showed that older population dwelling in an apartment in a large, urbanized city may be more likely to participate in RM-VPA than those dwelling in a house in a small rural area. This phenomenon can be explained by two previous studies that demonstrated why and how an exercise facility-rich environment may encourage recreational PA as follows. First, the inconvenience of accessing exercise facilities is mentioned as the reason for not participating in regular recreational PA. Nearby facilities decrease some of the barriers to engagement in recreational PA in that travel time and traffic-associated barriers are decreased [13,30,31]. Second, exercise facilities work as a psychological stimulus to change exercise habits. People dwelling near exercise facilities may frequently pay attention to exercise [31]. In the present study, even though the authors could not directly investigate whether accessing exercise facilities is convenient for older population in an apartment in an urbanized large city, it can be presumed that recently, in South Korea's urbanized large cities, there were many public or private exercise facilities, and it was easy to access these facilities via a well-organized transportation system, even for older population. In addition, because most recently built apartment buildings have resident-only exercise facilities, dwelling in apartments also positively affects participation in RMVPA. However, in the case of small rural areas, there is still a lack of exercise facilities, and it would be difficult for older population to access those facilities without private cars. Considering all of these factors, it is suggested that frequent exposure to exercise facilities in an apartment building in a large, urbanized city may increase motivation for recreational PA, and easy availability and accessibility to exercise facilities for older population may allow them to carry out habitual engagement in RMVPA.
On the one hand, Mohammad and his colleagues reported that better availability of physical activity destinations is important, but many things, including building design, transport infrastructure, residential density and street connectivity, affect people's behavior [30,32,33]. Given the reports, to clearly confirm the relationship between the living environment and RMVPA, all potential factors mentioned above should be considered. However, in the present study, the relationship between the living environment and RMVPA was investigated based on information regarding where the subjects lived. Thus, further investigation, which considers all of the potential factors, would be helpful to confirm the conclusion yielded by the present study. Additionally, since RMVPA data were collected by utilizing a questionnaire, there is a possibility of self-selection bias. Objective assessment of RMVPA would provide stronger evidence. Although those limitations exist in the present study, a strong strength is also recognized. The authors adjusted for several potential covariates, including age, marriage status, household income, educational level, medication use, alcohol consumption, smoking status, muscle strength, and nutrition, that may affect the RMVPA engagement of older population.
In conclusion, in these aged participants, living in an apartment in an urbanized large city was positively associated with the quantity of RM-VPA, regardless of sex. This finding suggests that enough nearby exercise facilities and accessibility improvement may contribute to an increase in recreational PA engagement in the older Korean population.

REFERENCES

1. Baek JY, Lee E, Jung HW, Jang IY. Geriatrics fact sheet in Korea 2021. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2021;25(2):65-71. DOI: 10.4235/agmr.21.0063.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. Kim B, Kim G, Lee Y, Taniguchi K, Isobe T, Oh S. Triglyceride-Glucose index as a potential indicator of sarcopenic obesity in older people. Nu-trients 2023;15(3):555. DOI: 10.3390/nu15030555.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Van Holle V, Van Cauwenberg J, Van Dyck D, Deforche B, Van de Weghe N, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Relationship between neighborhood walk-ability and older adults' physical activity: results from the Belgian Environmental Physical Activity Study in Seniors (BEPAS Seniors). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014;11(1):110. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-014-0110-3.
pmid pmc
4. Rockwood K, Howlett SE, MacKnight C, Beattie BL, Bergman H, Hébert R, et al. Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: Report from the Canadian study of health and aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004;59(12):1310-1317. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/59.12.1310.
crossref
5. Kim GM, Kim BK, Kim DR, Liao Y, Park JH, Park H. An association between lower extremity function and cognitive frailty: A sample population from the KFACS Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(3):1007. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031007.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, Heath GW, Howze EH, Powell KE, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002;22(4 Suppl):73-107. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00434-8.
pmid
7. Langhammer B, Bergland A, Rydwik E. The importance of physical activity exercise among older people. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:7856823. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7856823.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Yorston LC, Kolt GS, Rosenkranz RR. Physical activity and physical function in older adults: The 45 and up study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60(4):719-725. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03906.x.
pmid
9. Dhaliwal SS, Welborn TA, Howat PA. Recreational physical activity as an independent predictor of multivariable cardiovascular disease risk. PLoS One 2013;8(12):e83435. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083435.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Hildebrand JS, Gapstur SM, Campbell PT, Gaudet MM, Patel AV. Recreational physical activity and leisure-time sitting in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22(10):1906-1912. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0407.
crossref pmid pdf
11. De Silva ICM, Mielke GI, Bertoldi AD, Arrais PSD, Luiza VL, Mengue SS, et al. Overall and leisure-time physical activity among Brazilian adults: National survey based on the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. J Phys Act Health 2018;15(3):212-218. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0262.
crossref pmid
12. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health 2006;27:297-322. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100.
crossref pmid
13. Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: State of the science. Am J Prev Med 2009;36(4 Suppl):S99-123.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005.
pmid pmc
14. Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Frank LD, Pratt M, et al. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities world-wide: A cross-sectional study. Lancet 2016;387(10034):2207-2217. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2.
crossref pmid
15. Barnett DW, Barnett A, Nathan A, Van Cauwenberg J, Cerin E. Built environmental correlates of older adults' total physical activity and walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017;14(1):103. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. Jia L, Du Y, Chu L, Zhang Z, Li F, Lyu D, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: A cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health 2020;5(12):e661-e671. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7.
crossref pmid
17. Vahia IV, Jeste DV, Reynolds CF. Older adults and the mental health effects of COVID-19. JAMA 2020;324(22):2253-2254. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.21753.
crossref pmid
18. Hutchins HJ, Wolff B, Leeb R, Ko JY, Odom E, Willey J, et al. COVID-19 mitigation behaviors by age group-United States, April-June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69(43):1584-1590. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943e4.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Moreno-Tamayo K, Manrique-Espinoza B, Ramírez-García E, Sánchez-García S. Social isolation undermines quality of life in older adults. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020;32(11):1283-1292. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610219000310.
crossref pmid
20. Hupin D, Roche F, Gremeaux V, Chatard JC, Oriol M, Gaspoz JM, et al. Even a low-dose of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity reduces mortality by 22% in adults aged ≥ 60 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2015;49(19):1262-1267. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094306.
crossref pmid
21. Armstrong T, Bull F. Development of the World Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). J Public Health 2006;14(2):66-70. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-006-0024-x.
crossref pdf
22. Cleland CL, Hunter RF, Kee F, Cupples ME, Sallis JF, Tully MA. Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour. BMC Public Health 2014;14(1):1255. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1255.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
23. Mumu SJ, Ali L, Barnett A, Merom D. Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 2017;17(1):650. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4666-0.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
24. Rivière F, Widad FZ, Speyer E, Erpelding ML, Escalon H, Vuillemin A. Reliability and validity of the French version of the global physical activity questionnaire. J Sport Health Sci 2018;7(3):339-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.004.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Lee J, Lee C, Min J, Kang DW, Kim JY, Yang HI, et al. Development of the Korean Global Physical Activity Questionnaire: Reliability and validity study. Glob Health Promot 2020;27(3):44-55. DOI: 10.1177/1757975919854301.
crossref pmid pdf
26. Kim B, Kim GM, Han K, Maki N, Taniguchi K, Oh S. The triglyceride-glucose index is independently associated with chronic kidney disease in the geriatric population, regardless of obesity and sex. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2023;27(3):258-265. DOI: 10.4235/agmr.23.0096.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
27. Kim B, Kim GM, Kim E, Park J, Isobe T, Mori Y, et al. The anthropometric measure “A Body Shape Index” may predict the risk of osteoporosis in middle-aged and older Korean people. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(8):4926. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084926.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Kim B, Kim G, Kim E, Park J, Isobe T, Sakae T, et al. The A body shape index might be a stronger predictor of chronic kidney disease than BMI in a senior population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(24):12874. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182412874.
crossref pmid pmc
29. Kweon S, Kim Y, Jang MJ, Kim Y, Kim K, Choi S, et al. Data resource profile: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(1):69-77. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt228.
crossref pmid pmc
30. Koohsari MJ, McCormack GR, Nakaya T, Oka K. Neighbourhood built environment and cardiovascular disease: Knowledge and future directions. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020;17(5):261-263. DOI: 10.1038/s41569-020-0343-6.
crossref pmid pdf
31. Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, Elder JP, Hackley M, Caspersen CJ, et al. Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents. Public Health Rep 1990;105(2):179-185.
pmid pmc
32. Koohsari MJ, Yasunaga A, McCormack GR, Shibata A, Ishii K, Nakaya T, et al. Depression among middle-aged adults in Japan: The role of the built environment design. Landscape Urban Plan 2023;231:104651. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104651.
crossref
33. Koohsari J, Mccormack G, Nakaya T, Shibata A, Ishii K, Yasunaga A, et al. Walking-friendly built environments and objectively measured physical function in older adults. J Sport Health Sci 2020;9(6):651-656. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.02.002.
crossref pmid pmc
Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Health Informatics and Statistics
680 gukchaebosang-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Korea
E-mail: koshis@hanmail.net
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Health Informatics and Statistics.                 Developed in M2PI